| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | 大塚憲司 <otsuka(dot)kenji(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Date: | 2016-02-18 17:50:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQtQ2WDGRqa2g_dbfHuu9CebfWvJ_XpXggFoFG1mUYzXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think this is a bug and we ought to fix the code to include the
> metapage in the reported index_size. Thoughts?
I tend to agree, but I think you should note that specifically in the
documentation. I'm in favor of tools like pgstattuple and pageinspect
going into this kind of detail in their documentation generally.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-18 18:01:10 | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-18 17:40:48 | Re: The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-18 18:01:10 | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-18 17:40:48 | Re: The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |