From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checksums by default? |
Date: | 2017-01-26 00:14:00 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQt+f8u+8DqZ2_57k70qjEbcdb=vo16wUnTveoq7sS0=A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> As it is, there are backup solutions which *do* check the checksum when
> backing up PG. This is no longer, thankfully, some hypothetical thing,
> but something which really exists and will hopefully keep users from
> losing data.
Wouldn't that have issues with torn pages?
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-26 00:14:03 | Re: Should buffer of initialization fork have a BM_PERMANENT flag |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-01-25 23:30:24 | Re: Checksums by default? |