From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Date: 2015-11-02 18:52:49
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQkj0ce2-LpzH217R8G1dc1=2Lo10kcebLem4vY3LLkuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Not as often as you'd think, and it hasn't happened in the database
> world yet, for some good reasons. This is all besides the point,
> though; PostgreSQL has been accepting contributions from patent-holding
> companies for over a decade, and that doesn't seem likely to stop any
> time soon. Greenplum is not in any way special, especially since we
> already accepted contributions from Greenplum Inc. back in 2005-2006.

The way that patents are yielded as weapons tends to result in
technology companies seeking them out as a deterrent, if nothing else.
I am not in the least bit surprised that an EMC spin-out has a patent
portfolio.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-11-02 18:58:31 Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-11-02 18:36:48 Re: Patent warning about the Greenplum source code