From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | |
Date: | 2015-11-02 18:52:49 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQkj0ce2-LpzH217R8G1dc1=2Lo10kcebLem4vY3LLkuA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Not as often as you'd think, and it hasn't happened in the database
> world yet, for some good reasons. This is all besides the point,
> though; PostgreSQL has been accepting contributions from patent-holding
> companies for over a decade, and that doesn't seem likely to stop any
> time soon. Greenplum is not in any way special, especially since we
> already accepted contributions from Greenplum Inc. back in 2005-2006.
The way that patents are yielded as weapons tends to result in
technology companies seeking them out as a deterrent, if nothing else.
I am not in the least bit surprised that an EMC spin-out has a patent
portfolio.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-11-02 18:58:31 | Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-11-02 18:36:48 | Re: Patent warning about the Greenplum source code |