Re: Moving Pivotal's Greenplum work upstream

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ewan Higgs <ewan_higgs(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving Pivotal's Greenplum work upstream
Date: 2015-03-17 20:09:43
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQk=3JXHzxE1znZSx_VOno7DpAyJx1yp7v=hOK3WLQzgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I think we would need to create a team to learn the Greenplum code and
> move over what is reasonable. My guess is there is no desire in our
> community to totally merge or maintain the Greenplum code --- of course,
> that is just a guess.

Let's wait until they actually release the code. I see no reason to
assume anything about it one way or the other just yet.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-03-17 20:23:32 Re: GSoC 2015: Introduction and Doubt regarding a Project.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-17 20:06:46 Re: Moving Pivotal's Greenplum work upstream