| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Date: | 2016-06-09 18:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQS9idryPMzUZ7UOHgKT-5-qzJAM88BBHhfiae4NrDEmg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, I pushed this after re-reviewing it and fixing a number of
> oversights. There remains only the task of adding max_parallel_degree
> as a system-wide limit (as opposed to max_parallel_degree now
> max_parallel_workers_per_gather which is a per-Gather limit), which
> I'm going to argue should be a new open item and not necessarily one
> that I have to own myself. I would like to take care of it, but I
> will not put it ahead of fixing actual defects and I will not promise
> to have it done in time for 9.6.
I am in favor of having something similar to
max_parallel_workers_per_gather for utility statements like CREATE
INDEX. That will need a cost model, at least where the DBA isn't
explicit about the number of workers to use.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-09 18:08:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't generate parallel paths for rels with parallel-restricted |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-09 17:59:00 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |