Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Matthew Kelly <mkelly(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthew Spilich <mspilich(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Date: 2014-09-17 18:07:39
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQS-EyZ8ubsYVwvRa3OoTb2BX6MYLtFTyCf3EP9_hMFEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> We could at least use the GNU facility for versioning collations where
>> available, LC_IDENTIFICATION [1].
>
> It looks like the revisions or dates reported by LC_IDENTIFICATION
> aren't ever updated for most locales.

That's not surprising. There is zero controversy about how to
correctly sort English text, for example. For other languages, that
might be much less true.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-17 18:08:34 Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-17 18:05:11 Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps