Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module
Date: 2016-04-09 23:46:31
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQJQTsMxNnrJ6PwM6sDtZ=d1KN0PakmcqdKoCTo-k-iUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> I find this added test duration reasonable. If someone identifies a way to
> realize similar coverage with lower duration, I'd value that contribution. -1
> for meeting some runtime target at the expense of coverage. Older modules
> have rather little test coverage, so they're poor as benchmarks.

+1.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-10 01:49:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-04-09 23:43:32 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-10 01:49:03 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-04-09 23:43:32 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module