From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module |
Date: | 2016-04-09 23:46:31 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQJQTsMxNnrJ6PwM6sDtZ=d1KN0PakmcqdKoCTo-k-iUw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> I find this added test duration reasonable. If someone identifies a way to
> realize similar coverage with lower duration, I'd value that contribution. -1
> for meeting some runtime target at the expense of coverage. Older modules
> have rather little test coverage, so they're poor as benchmarks.
+1.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-10 01:49:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-04-09 23:43:32 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-10 01:49:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-04-09 23:43:32 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bloom index contrib module |