| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | david(at)gravitext(dot)com, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery |
| Date: | 2016-07-12 18:40:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQDo9yiLFg9rnf1W0XwJLeZ9MD56-1iW-ynnHaqFY+SFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:58 AM, <david(at)gravitext(dot)com> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 14245
> Logged by: David Kellum
> Email address: david(at)gravitext(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.6beta2
> Operating system: Linux
> Description:
>
> I am doing some (fuzz) testing of full text queries and managed to
> generate the following case which causes a SEGFAULT on PostgreSQL 9.6
> beta1 and beta2:
>
> select to_tsquery('!(a & !b) & c') as tsquery
Interesting discovery. How did you fuzz test?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-12 19:01:02 | Re: BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery |
| Previous Message | david | 2016-07-12 17:58:55 | BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-12 19:01:02 | Re: BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2016-07-12 18:39:20 | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |