| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remaining open items |
| Date: | 2015-10-15 17:48:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQ8sf838VSce0qqXZmyc7eyafXuyCc=3n2dzoRqb40FOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>
> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.
While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in
doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That
seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking
behind putting it on the open items list.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-15 17:51:44 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-15 17:39:22 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt |