Re: Releasing in September

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Releasing in September
Date: 2016-01-21 05:47:23
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQ2y-5+Cv8+pQsZYF4Ri-AQJhyVT7SQQCs7L9=FFEFVXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We have automatic buildfarm coverage on many platforms. Perhaps we
> could live without that with a buildfarm module though.

It's not clear that buildfarm coverage makes sense for sqlsmith. If it
does make sense, I see no reason why introducing it should be attached
to sqlsmith's inclusion in core.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-01-21 05:47:29 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-21 05:37:28 Re: Releasing in September