Re: Use of term Master/Slave

From: Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sabrina(dot)iqbal(at)target(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use of term Master/Slave
Date: 2017-08-01 23:26:35
Message-ID: CAM2FmMqe8eeoHEgX6-w44Xj5QhV+T-oZLvUL7aRuaq5oR35gPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 1 August 2017 at 09:13, <sabrina(dot)iqbal(at)target(dot)com> wrote:
> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there
> are other terms like primary/secondary that can be used in the same manner.

Another alternative I've seen in different fields is "manager" and "agent".

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Segu 2017-08-02 00:32:04 Re: Reg Date/Time function
Previous Message Mike Toews 2017-08-01 23:20:22 Re: Reg Date/Time function