| From: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cache lookup failed for collation 0 |
| Date: | 2019-04-15 05:44:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAM2+6=WLDy5=YYBLTPK+ZVNwidw_O6_+MGHcaPxgxkB-NUO6Sg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2019-04-11 17:04, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> > The error is coming from get_collation_isdeterministic() when colloid
> > passed is 0. I think like we do in get_collation_name(), we should
> > return false here when such collation oid does not exist.
>
> I'm not in favor of doing that. It would risk papering over errors of
> omission at other call sites.
>
> The root cause is that the same code match_pattern_prefix() is being
> used for text and bytea, but bytea does not use collations, so having
> the collation 0 is expected, and we shouldn't call
> get_collation_isdeterministic() in that case.
>
> Proposed patch attached.
>
Looks fine to me.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-04-15 06:07:24 | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |
| Previous Message | Ramanarayana | 2019-04-15 05:06:19 | Mailing list not working |