Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Date: 2017-12-13 13:07:43
Message-ID: CAM2+6=W=knMQX7UTy=n4yaRnTLz0mYmpDQ0FPzttzPP146SAsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Here are review comments for 0009
>

Thank you, Ashutosh for the detailed review so far.

I am working on your reviews but since parallel Append is now committed,
I need to re-base my changes over it and need to resolve the conflicts too.

Once done, I will submit the new patch-set fixing these and earlier review
comments.

Thanks
--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2017-12-13 13:46:14 Re: [HACKERS] eval_const_expresisions and ScalarArrayOpExpr
Previous Message David Steele 2017-12-13 12:34:36 Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups