Re: volunteer to draft next update release

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

>
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 10/18/2016 02:50 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Oh, also: 9.1 is EOL as of this release.
>> >>>
>> >>> There are several big fixes in this release, including a
>> data-corruption
>> >>> one for 9.6.
>> >>
>> >> Sounds like it will be a fun writeup. Looking forward to getting the
>> >> specific feature list.
>> >
>> > Well, whoever is going to be doing this should be going out on hackers
>> > now and figuring out what the big fixes are. That's frankly most of the
>> > work -- well, that and the list of minor fixes, which will come on its
>> > own on Monday.
>>
>> Per Tom on the -hackers thread, he advised waiting for the release
>> notes. Heikki identified the two major things.
>>
>> Would you recommended drafting the notes in the wiki or in the “press”
>> repo or put it in a thread?
>>
>
> FYI, I have added a template named update_201610.md under the
> /update_releases/current in the press repo.
>
>
> Found this. I am going to start filling in details. Do I have push
> writes to the repo?
>
>
> Answer is yes.
>
> Because this is my first time doing this, I want to work on it early and
> often to get into the proper cadence :-) I took a try at writing up the
> data corruption issue as well as adding the EOL language:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=press.git;a=commitdiff;h=
> 38aadd18e9c64f30423f81920381b001fff8b4c5;hp=1ada1db63eaed94e499c1289e90bdf
> 70a47f9fc0
>
> I understand part of the challenge is taking the detailed commit notes and
> putting it into language that makes sense to the users, which is why I want
> more eyes on this. I intend to fill out more details once the rest of the
> release notes are out, but if there are major issues I find it prudent that
> we get the language for that correct so users understand the ramifications
> and the need to upgrade.
>

I have pushed a few changes.

>
> Thanks!
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>