From: | Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: volunteer to draft next update release |
Date: | 2016-10-19 15:12:43 |
Message-ID: | CAM184Ac+T3hrJk83YsfFp=5D4fNsbRxqNxfo_8R3Y7oqp6hD2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
>
> > On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/18/2016 02:50 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> >
> >>> Oh, also: 9.1 is EOL as of this release.
> >>>
> >>> There are several big fixes in this release, including a
> data-corruption
> >>> one for 9.6.
> >>
> >> Sounds like it will be a fun writeup. Looking forward to getting the
> >> specific feature list.
> >
> > Well, whoever is going to be doing this should be going out on hackers
> > now and figuring out what the big fixes are. That's frankly most of the
> > work -- well, that and the list of minor fixes, which will come on its
> > own on Monday.
>
> Per Tom on the -hackers thread, he advised waiting for the release notes.
> Heikki identified the two major things.
>
> Would you recommended drafting the notes in the wiki or in the “press”
> repo or put it in a thread?
>
FYI, I have added a template named update_201610.md under the
/update_releases/current in the press repo.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2016-10-19 15:13:35 | Re: volunteer to draft next update release |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2016-10-19 15:09:56 | Re: volunteer to draft next update release |