Re: Failing start-up archive recovery at Standby mode in PG9.2.4

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <kyota(dot)horiguchi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failing start-up archive recovery at Standby mode in PG9.2.4
Date: 2013-04-25 15:21:00
Message-ID: CAM103Dtrc=J8=tcKzWfeNccBaEwmd+c8ncy3fBsLiNy7MobQQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I forgot it.

> In conclusion, the standby should name the recycled WAL segment using
the same TLI for the LSN on the master. Or should never recycle WAL
files.

Or the standby should make the request with correct TLI at first
consulting the timeline history.
Or the standby should make retry with the more small TLIs after it
gets broken segments.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-04-25 15:24:53 Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-04-25 15:19:52 Re: putting a bgworker to rest