On 12 July 2017 at 15:27, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> That said, this is not intended to *replace* the username/password login
> part, it would be in addition to it.
In that case I think it's actively a bad idea. If people would still
have to create another password there's no point and it would
contribute to people not wanting to use common auth schemes like this.
If you just have to make a username that's not as bad (though not ideal).
--
greg