Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-17 14:51:33
Message-ID: CAM-w4HPaWXrWwAY=btHw=OUpTwoxAmvRre050=VG54S5YwHYwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> During the 9.5 cycle, and earlier, the topic of increasing our minimum
> bar for compilers came up a bunch of times. Specifically whether we
> still should continue to use C90 as a baseline.
>
> I think the time has come to rely at least on some newer features.

I don't have much opinion on the topic (aside from "it's nice that we
run on old systems" but that's neither here nor there).

But I'm not clear from the discussion exactly which compilers we're
thinking of ruling out. For GCC are we talking about bumping the
minimum version required or are all current versions of GCC new enough
and we're only talking about old HPUX/Solaris/etc compilers?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-08-17 14:53:16 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-17 14:48:25 Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE