| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-02-23 12:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HPZiQbqyxeD+y6X1HKuPgbwAX3QOT_gk2e2uxmyiEe2hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I prefer RESET, especially since it could eventually support RESET ALL
> MATERIALIZED VIEWS if that turns out to be useful. How does the parser
> like that?
Isn't reset currently only used for GUCs? I think that makes for a
strange crossover.
Really, I'm sorry for bringing this up. I really don't think
"truncate" is a bad way to spell it.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-02-23 13:00:14 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-23 05:29:46 | pgsql: doc: Add more compatibility information for triggers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-02-23 13:00:14 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-02-23 12:37:34 | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |