| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Date: | 2013-04-17 15:58:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HPSefBjK+wn61PwVQLHt0tK_5KkbeLFbK71LYPJERk=cw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
> Is there any way we can change the checksum algorithm in 9.4
> *without* breaking pg_upgrade?
Personally I think we're going to need a solution for page format
changes someday eventually....
What advantages are we postponing now to avoid it?
* 32-bit checksums?
* Being able to enable/disable checksums?
Anything else?
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2013-04-17 16:10:56 | Changing schema on the fly |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2013-04-17 15:54:46 | Re: Enabling Checksums |