From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Date: | 2013-08-01 14:40:22 |
Message-ID: | CAM-w4HP7=a2VowyJUD0CAZL5b8FsaHymdQeouLudSOhdnCw_zg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Why isn't it enough to just dump out all variables with a source of alter
system to a text file? You can either have a single global lock around that
operation or write it to a new file and move it into place.
--
greg
On 1 Aug 2013 15:19, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-08-01 15:17:04 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> > We don't need per guc locking. This is the whole objection Tom had about
> > this patch being more complex than it has to be.
>
> IIRC he objected to using locking *at all* because a simple
> one-file-per-setting approach should be used.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2013-08-01 14:47:32 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2013-08-01 14:26:38 | Re: How to configer the pg_hba record which the database name with "\n" ? |