Re: New email address

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New email address
Date: 2015-11-25 17:50:53
Message-ID: CAM-w4HP5NkUzGuRYKAG9dDjn5J962Zz8_pDQWrvOw=55nRH3bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It's a reasonable idea for mailing list software to put the list in
Sender given that it's the "agent responsible for the actual
transmission of the message" as RFC2822 specifies. But you could just
as easily argue that the list is just relaying the message and the
agent actually transmitting the message is the webmail provider the
user used to compose the message. In a case like mine where I send it
from gmail but use my .edu email address that's a sensible
interpretation.

But my point was that while the RFC says what to put there there's
absolutely no reference anywhere for when the information should cause
any MUA or MTA to behave differently. Responses are governed entirely
by From and Reply-To, bounces don't use it, and so on. It's a bit of
extra information that can optionally be added but there's no
indication of how it should be used. Using it for anything aside from
abuse investigations is going to pretty much always be wrong.

RFC2822:

The originator fields indicate the mailbox(es) of the source of the
message. The "From:" field specifies the author(s) of the message,
that is, the mailbox(es) of the person(s) or system(s) responsible
for the writing of the message. The "Sender:" field specifies the
mailbox of the agent responsible for the actual transmission of the
message. For example, if a secretary were to send a message for
another person, the mailbox of the secretary would appear in the
"Sender:" field and the mailbox of the actual author would appear in
the "From:" field. If the originator of the message can be indicated
by a single mailbox and the author and transmitter are identical, the
"Sender:" field SHOULD NOT be used. Otherwise, both fields SHOULD
appear.

The originator fields also provide the information required when
replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it
indicates the mailbox(es) to which the author of the message suggests
that replies be sent. In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field,
replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the
"From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the
reply.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-25 17:57:24 Re: Bug in numeric multiplication
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2015-11-25 17:47:17 Re: Bug in numeric multiplication