Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>
Cc: Andrei Zubkov <zubkov(at)moonset(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2022-03-25 04:37:57
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOAmUKLwqyVcpsdmdvzmPTb+9vGV=Xdsi8TRcM6hkLAww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch seems to have gotten some feedback but development has
stalled. It's marked "waiting on author" but I'm not clear exactly
what is expected from the authors here. It seems there isn't really
consensus on the design at the moment. There's been no emails in over
a month.

Fwiw I find the idea of having a separate "aux" table kind of awkward.
It'll seem strange to users not familiar with the history and without
any clear idea why the fields are split.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2022-03-25 04:49:46 Re: Is there any documentation on how to correctly create extensions in HA(primary-standby) setup?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2022-03-25 04:27:46 Re: Add psql command to list constraints