From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New version numbering practices |
Date: | 2016-08-03 16:51:45 |
Message-ID: | CAM-w4HO0nW1bsm_cPF3-fAHd5OAw0MEC5pJiXX+Zu8cea7V4-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I thought we'd pretty much done that cleanup during the cvs->git
> conversion?
I guess I'm talking about tags. I'm not clear on the distinction
between tags and branches names in git.
Prior to 8.0.0 we seem to have tagged the first release with a tag
that doesn't include _0 for the minor release and afterwards with one
that does:
REL2_0
REL6_1
REL6_2
REL6_4
REL7_0
REL7_1
REL7_2
REL7_3
REL7_4
REL8_0_0
REL8_1_0
...
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2016-08-03 17:04:40 | Re: New version numbering practices |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2016-08-03 16:44:25 | Re: OldSnapshotTimemapLock information is missing in monitoring.sgml file |