Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (and pg_ls_*)

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (and pg_ls_*)
Date: 2022-04-03 13:39:35
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNisH46b7uh0+78F_9RhJd-kAf0=DOkRdDLrn7q=+j51A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The cfbot is failing testing this patch. It seems... unlikely given
the nature of the patch modifying an admin function that doesn't even
modify the database that it should be breaking a streaming test.
Perhaps the streaming test is using this function in the testing
scaffolding?

[03:19:29.564] # Failed test 'regression tests pass'
[03:19:29.564] # at t/027_stream_regress.pl line 76.
[03:19:29.564] # got: '256'
[03:19:29.564] # expected: '0'
[03:19:29.564] # Looks like you failed 1 test of 5.
[03:19:29.565] [03:19:27] t/027_stream_regress.pl ..............
[03:19:29.565] Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
[03:19:29.565] Failed 1/5 subtests

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2022-04-03 14:42:37 Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage
Previous Message Greg Stark 2022-04-03 13:31:07 Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key