Re: [PATCH] Add initial xid/mxid/mxoff to initdb

From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add initial xid/mxid/mxoff to initdb
Date: 2023-03-20 19:30:41
Message-ID: CAM-w4HN5hO98D=z8oOBcCf0AjshS3-k1-XhZ3a=uUJTD-CScZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 07:22, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Just for completeness, over in the other thread the feedback was that
> this functionality is better put into pg_resetwal.

So is that other thread tracked in a different commitfest entry and
this one completely redundant? I'll mark it Rejected then?

--
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 19:34:55 Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()
Previous Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 19:27:37 Re: pg_stats and range statistics