Re: leakproof

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-20 03:17:48
Message-ID: CAM-w4HMhhORMUEeEOg4HTw1V83vb6SJKJ-pqU9pkr=Rpqmndpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I suspect this is wrong for similar reasons as "pure" but I'll throw
it out there: "hermetic"

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-20 03:24:44 Re: leakproof
Previous Message Don Baccus 2012-02-20 02:20:09 Re: leakproof