From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Date: | 2021-12-16 22:03:23 |
Message-ID: | CAM-w4HM8PD=3ATj4CnVZcmJTNRsintcA61LQ94WmJF7h7UaLzw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I had a similar question. And I'm still not clear from the response
what exactly index_blks_total is and whether it addresses it.
I think I agree that a user is likely to want to see the progress in a
way they can understand which means for a single index at a time.
I think what you're describing is that index_blks_total and
index_blks_scanned are the totals across all the indexes? That isn't
clear from the definitions but if that's what you intend then I think
that would work.
(For what it's worth what I was imagining was having a pair of
counters for blocks scanned and max blocks in this index and a second
counter for number of indexes processed and max number of indexes. But
I don't think that's necessarily any better than what you have)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-12-16 22:40:43 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Previous Message | Imseih (AWS), Sami | 2021-12-16 21:37:11 | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |