Re: Difference in the size of database size and relations

From: Luis <luisico(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Difference in the size of database size and relations
Date: 2013-12-10 14:09:42
Message-ID: CAM-gcbSUcpdrxVxW0jLRJeUhDdPvmL6ZUrEKRkkw+rYeRfKeyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Sorry, my bad. I did run that query with pg_total_relation_size before
but somehow I sent by email the one a query without the total.
The result is basically the same:

size
---------
100 MB
60 MB
10 MB
9928 kB
5280 kB
5144 kB
3360 kB
2144 kB
1152 kB
2128 kB
544 kB
528 kB
336 kB
336 kB
336 kB
304 kB
296 kB
288 kB
288 kB
101 MB

thanks

2013/12/10 bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Luis <luisico(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Actually the query I used to get the relations sizes also included
>> indexes and even pg_toast.
>
>
> Your query appears to be using "pg_relation_size()", try it again with
> "pg_total_relation_size()" to include indexes and toast tables.
>
> Specifics can be found at:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-admin.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2013-12-10 14:09:54 Re: Difference in the size of database size and relations
Previous Message bricklen 2013-12-10 14:04:33 Re: Difference in the size of database size and relations