Re: Assitance needed for the resolution of memory leak

From: Sasmit Utkarsh <utkarshsasmit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assitance needed for the resolution of memory leak
Date: 2023-10-11 21:19:12
Message-ID: CAM-5MT0RX8Szzo6JE7FEWWvrt6CzNszWBsJrmDOvmY5=0Wh-Og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks Tom, It did work, and yeah I do have indentation in my editor, there
was some formatting issue due to the copy and paste of the code.
:)

Regards,
Sasmit Utkarsh
+91-7674022625

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 2:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Sasmit Utkarsh <utkarshsasmit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Like for an ex: I have provided the test run for a file which has 4
> > duplicate entries in the input file and below is the leak reported. I
> have
> > followed
> > consistently using PQclear to free all PGresult objects.
>
> No you haven't: you've got two PQexec-something calls and
> only one PQclear. If control reaches here:
>
> > res = PQexec(conn, Command);
>
> that will overwrite your only pointer to the PQexecParams
> result, and you won't clear it.
>
> BTW, if this is what your code actually looks like in your editor,
> it's no wonder you can't follow its basic control flow. Indent
> according to the brace structure, and your life will get easier.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2023-10-12 00:05:20 Re: Assitance needed for the resolution of memory leak
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-11 20:37:15 Re: Assitance needed for the resolution of memory leak