Re: Was my question inappropriate for postgres?

From: Alicja Kucharczyk <zaledwie10minut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Was my question inappropriate for postgres?
Date: 2022-07-25 08:17:05
Message-ID: CAM=sWa5TzVCxpgOmBTy5avVArVa_M-ezajJQDAyN6ZA-4YxF7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> 3) "...compatible to Microsoft's M365." I who am not a Windows user,
> knew what the OP meant. And if you go here:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_365#As_%22Microsoft_365%22
>
> You will see:
>
> "On March 30, 2020, Microsoft announced that the consumer plans of
> Office 365 would be rebranded as "Microsoft 365" (a brand also used by
> Microsoft for an enterprise subscription bundle of Windows, Office 365,
> and security services) on April 21, 2020, succeeding existing consumer
> plans of Office 365."
>
> So M365 is actually more correct then 0365.
>

I asked a colleague, who is managing M365 licenses at MS and he agrees with
your statement Adrian that M365 is more correct than O365. What he also
mentioned that the case is a bit more complicated and in practice both,
i.e. O365 and M365 are fine to use.

pozdrawiam,
best regards,
mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Alicja Kucharczyk
*Warsaw PostgreSQL User Group*
<https://www.meetup.com/pl-PL/Warsaw-PostgreSQL-Users-Group/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael J. Baars 2022-07-25 10:01:18 Password reset link / 'less' does not exit in psql version 13.4
Previous Message Martin Kalcher 2022-07-25 07:34:31 Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()