From: | Alicja Kucharczyk <zaledwie10minut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Was my question inappropriate for postgres? |
Date: | 2022-07-25 08:17:05 |
Message-ID: | CAM=sWa5TzVCxpgOmBTy5avVArVa_M-ezajJQDAyN6ZA-4YxF7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> 3) "...compatible to Microsoft's M365." I who am not a Windows user,
> knew what the OP meant. And if you go here:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_365#As_%22Microsoft_365%22
>
> You will see:
>
> "On March 30, 2020, Microsoft announced that the consumer plans of
> Office 365 would be rebranded as "Microsoft 365" (a brand also used by
> Microsoft for an enterprise subscription bundle of Windows, Office 365,
> and security services) on April 21, 2020, succeeding existing consumer
> plans of Office 365."
>
> So M365 is actually more correct then 0365.
>
I asked a colleague, who is managing M365 licenses at MS and he agrees with
your statement Adrian that M365 is more correct than O365. What he also
mentioned that the case is a bit more complicated and in practice both,
i.e. O365 and M365 are fine to use.
pozdrawiam,
best regards,
mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Alicja Kucharczyk
*Warsaw PostgreSQL User Group*
<https://www.meetup.com/pl-PL/Warsaw-PostgreSQL-Users-Group/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael J. Baars | 2022-07-25 10:01:18 | Password reset link / 'less' does not exit in psql version 13.4 |
Previous Message | Martin Kalcher | 2022-07-25 07:34:31 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample() |