Re: Fwd: A million users

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, 4:42 PM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <
a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Exactly! In the later versions, security gets more and more refined and
> strengthened. So ppl should think about moving away from "public" , and
> start implementing finer grained schemes of security, as you suggest. +
> \dp shows prettier than having 1000+ users listed.
>

I wanted to just communicate the limits.
a lot of postgresql architecture can leverage the resources and scale, but
not all.
i had 100s of 1000s of tables on my setup where i worked last.
if i did \dt it would freeze all the time. i had to exit the pdwl session,
check the source code of how the partition was named and then look for what
I wanted.
if things are pretty with psql or not should not be a criteria for how many
objects you want to have.

i would expect clear exceptions so one knows what the real problem is.
the error I got did not in anyway communicate the role limits for col size
limits.