From: | Vijaykumar Jain <vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WALWriteLock |
Date: | 2021-07-07 20:14:05 |
Message-ID: | CAM+6J95qpTyOiK=8aCxEc2CAbi=6xa+u=_DUTOu1PG8wx0Ts6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021, 1:22 AM Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:14 AM Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm seeing a lot of WALWriteLocks , is this a bad sign , what might cause
>> this?
>>
>
> Are you having a performance problem you are trying to track down? If so,
> this probably indicates the cause. If not, then it is probably not a bad
> sign.
>
> The likely cause is that multiple sessions are trying to COMMIT at the
> same time, and are blocking on the slow fsync of the WAL data. One process
> will block on WALSync, all the ones queued up behind it will block on
> WALWrite.
>
Is this reproducible ? I mean I have seen multiple ppl raising a similar
issue but I could not really reproduce on my laptop, tried with slow disk,
introducing random latency etc. I even tried running gdb on a few processes
and trying to force into acquire a walwrite lock but not release it etc but
I guess I was not doing it correctly.
If the db is slowed down due to high concurrent usage trying to commit at
same time, how do we arrive at a baseline of how much a server can handle
before it starts tripping.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2021-07-07 20:51:36 | Re: WALWriteLock |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2021-07-07 20:12:41 | Re: D in top results for checkpoint |