Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error

From: Mor Lehr <mor(dot)lehr(at)deel(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error
Date: 2024-06-02 15:42:38
Message-ID: CALyvM2ZcywTKdxgYZhAXjmdxTuBT2RyW+cn0XwwHxXbfvXMBEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Thanks for the reference.
We learn new stuff every day.

You can close the case.
Thanks, Mor

On Sun, Jun 2, 2024, 18:31 David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Sunday, June 2, 2024, Mor Lehr <mor(dot)lehr(at)deel(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>> Can you please refer me to the section in the documentation that
>> describes this behavior?
>> This (automatically interperting 1 as select 1) is totally an unexpected
>> behavior for me.
>>
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-statements.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-ASSIGNMENT
>
> “As explained previously, the expression in such a statement is evaluated
> by means of an SQL SELECT command sent to the main database engine.”
>
> David J.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Floris Van Nee 2024-06-02 21:31:56 RE: BUG #17947: Combination of replslots pgstat issues causes error/assertion failure
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-06-02 15:31:42 Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error