Resolved: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X

From: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Resolved: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Date: 2019-03-07 13:39:49
Message-ID: CALvqh4pNqfW9_nx2c3w8c=wrPZk_uxwbW5sGocYe+HyC+0gUcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Thanks again.

Perumal Raju

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 2:32 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:44:16PM -0800, Perumal Raj wrote:
> > Any pointers for pg_repack schema creation ?
>
> With recent postgres, you should use just: "CREATE EXTENSION pg_repack",
> which
> does all that for you.
>
> > Will there be any impact in the future , Since i used --link option ?
>
> You probably have an old DB directory laying around which is (at least
> partially) hardlinks. You should remove it .. but be careful to remove the
> correct dir. My scripts always rename the old dir before running
> pg_upgrade,
> so it's less scary to rm -fr it later.
>
> Justin
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-07 13:54:17 Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-03-07 12:35:03 Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-03-07 13:40:32 Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-03-07 13:03:19 Re: pgsql: Removed unused variable, openLogOff.