Re: pg_upgrade : 9.X to 11.X issue CentoOS 7.6

Hi All,

Yes, , bin file correct only as it came up with CentOS 7.6 .

Anyhow , thanks for the pointers which helped me to look at hacking
solution :-)

Currently , upgrade is running. will keep u posted with results.

Thanks,

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> > On 7/23/19 7:17 AM, Perumal Raj wrote:
> >> command: "/usr/pgsql-9.2/bin/pg_ctl" -w -l "pg_upgrade_server.log" -D
> >> "/data/db/data" -o "-p 5432 -b -c listen_addresses='' -c
> >> unix_socket_permissions=0700 -c unix_socket_directory='/var/lib/pgsql'"
> >> start >> "pg_upgrade_server.log" 2>&1
> >> waiting for server to start....FATAL: unrecognized configuration
> >> parameter "unix_socket_directory"
>
> > Well unix_socket_directory changed to unix_socket_directories in 9.3.
>
> Yeah, this is clearly a version-skew problem. pg_upgrade knows it
> should say unix_socket_directory not unix_socket_directories to a pre-9.3
> server, but that's going wrong somehow.
>
> > Are you sure that /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin/pg_ctl is really pointing to a 9.2
> > binary?
>
> For quite some time, Red Hat shipped versions of 9.2.x that were patched
> to understand unix_socket_directories not unix_socket_directory. I would
> be suspicious that the source server was one of those, except that the
> cited path doesn't match where the Red Hat RPMs put it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>