| From: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: block-level incremental backup |
| Date: | 2019-09-03 16:46:13 |
| Message-ID: | CALtqXTeAV-0SEjALJpwo0YxkwR9TnfBFTu+P=rBc8ukkZ4zcrQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:39 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > +1 using the library to tar. But I think reason not using tar library is
> TAR is
> > one of the most simple file format. What is the best/newest format of
> TAR?
>
> So, I don't really want to go down this path at all, as I already
> said. You can certainly do your own research on this topic if you
> wish.
>
> I did that and have experience working on the TAR format. I was curious
about what
"best/newest" you are talking.
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Ibrar Ahmed
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-03 16:46:33 | Re: dropdb --force |
| Previous Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2019-09-03 16:44:25 | Re: block-level incremental backup |