From: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shawn Wang <shawn(dot)wang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption |
Date: | 2019-09-03 17:30:24 |
Message-ID: | CALtqXTdg48MYTppxvBy9=kLHyCe8-3wYECw7vAqqxZHn4Bxi5g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:21 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 2019-Aug-02, Shawn Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi Antonin,
> > It is very glad to see the new patch. I used the public patches a long
> time ago.
> > I did some tests like the stream replication, much data running,
> temporary files encryption.
> > I found that there is an issue in the
> src/backend/storage/file/encryption.c. You should put block_size =
> EVP_CIPHER_CTX_block_size(ctx); under the #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING.
> > There is some problem to merge your patches to the latest kernel in the
> pg_ctl.c.
>
> Is a new, fixed version going to be posted soon? It's been a while.
>
> Also, apologies if this has been asked before, but: how does this patch
> relate to the stuff being discussed in
> https://postgr.es/m/031401d3f41d$5c70ed90$1552c8b0$@lab.ntt.co.jp ?
>
> Yes, it is related to that, but we don't have that on our agenda in a
weekly meeting. It has
many conflicting points about what we are doing. Swada / Bruce can comment
on that.
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
>
--
Ibrar Ahmed
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-03 17:31:27 | Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-03 17:29:05 | Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE |