From: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Evaluate expression at planning time for two more cases |
Date: | 2021-03-08 16:12:52 |
Message-ID: | CALtqXTc0T9Gi4sz0-_gBACOuPTV588jt+zJgDuUL=aTYkKwCSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:47 PM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi Pavel Borisov,
> It's always good to select the optimal way even if it didn't have
> performance gain
> but in case of this patch i see 4x speed up on my laptop and it will work
> on any
> table that have NULL constraint
>
> regards
> Surafel
>
The patch (null_check_on_pkey_optimization_v2.patch) does not apply
successfully.
http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2699.log
1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c.rej
It was a minor change therefore I rebased the patch, please take a look.
--
Ibrar Ahmed
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
null_check_on_pkey_optimization_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2021-03-08 16:15:53 | Re: Yet another fast GiST build |
Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2021-03-08 16:04:15 | Re: [PATCH] pg_ownerships system view |