| From: | Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org" <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: releasing ParallelApplyTxnHash when pa_launch_parallel_worker returns NULL |
| Date: | 2023-01-11 02:20:54 |
| Message-ID: | CALte62yU-=b8XyNCJbHOj2g=OmqtO=tjStNsNmFqWK4ceEjs+A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:13 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <
houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 1:25 AM Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I was reading src/backend/replication/logical/applyparallelworker.c .
> > In `pa_allocate_worker`, when pa_launch_parallel_worker returns NULL, I
> think the `ParallelApplyTxnHash` should be released.
>
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> ParallelApplyTxnHash is used to cache the state of streaming transactions
> being
> applied. There could be multiple streaming transactions being applied in
> parallel and their information were already saved in ParallelApplyTxnHash,
> so
> we should not release them just because we don't have a worker available to
> handle a new transaction here.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hou zj
>
Hi,
/* First time through, initialize parallel apply worker state
hashtable. */
if (!ParallelApplyTxnHash)
I think it would be better if `ParallelApplyTxnHash` is created by the
first successful parallel apply worker.
Please take a look at the new patch and see if it makes sense.
Cheers
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| create-parallel-apply-txn-hash-after-the-first-worker.patch | application/octet-stream | 875 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-01-11 02:26:17 | Re: pgsql: Add new GUC createrole_self_grant. |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-01-11 02:16:42 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |