Re: PostgreSQL registry entries for apt-get/yum/rpm install

From: dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL registry entries for apt-get/yum/rpm install
Date: 2013-05-02 12:03:14
Message-ID: CALnrH7ookt7r8mYaLjB7o8m5r=7r_U2OUiuQWA4f6hKmmuWh6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thank you Jasen/Karsten for your guidance.

Best Regards,
Dinesh
manojadinesh.blogspot.com

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:

> On 2013-04-15, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > --047d7b675e70cee73c04da61865c
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Dear Sirs,
> >
> > Apologizes, if this is a duplicate question.
> >
> > Would like to request you to share your valuable inputs on this. I would
> > like to know the PostgreSQL registry entries when we install it through
> > apt-get/yum/rpm.
>
> yes, the packaged versions of postgres are recorded as being present
> but this is not in a public data store like the windows registry.
>
> See the documentation for rpm (or dpkg etc, as apropriate)
> for how to test for the presence of postgresql.
>
> --
> ⚂⚃ 100% natural
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dinesh kumar 2013-05-02 12:09:23 Position() Bug ? In PostgreSQL 9.2
Previous Message Andrew Hastie 2013-05-02 09:41:52 Re: zLinux Load Testing Experience