From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data |
Date: | 2020-11-12 10:47:43 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACXZH8=b2MjmQrPhbdPx62mph1S8CG1TvP2P78fkXnoNOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the comments.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:36 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 07:31:49PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Yes we do not have anything related to permissions mentioned in the
> > documentation. So, I'm not adding it now.
>
> It would be good to clarify that in the docs while we are on it.
>
Added.
>
> I don't think this is sufficient. Could you add more test cases here?
> I can think of, coming down actually to the callers of
> CreateIntoRelDestReceiver:
> - A plain CTAS WITH NO DATA, that should pass,
> - CTAS EXECUTE WITH NO DATA, that should pass.
> - CTAS EXECUTE WITH DATA, that should not pass.
> - EXPLAIN CTAS WITH DATA, that should not pass.
>
Done.
On HEAD/master, the behaviour is as follows: a) for plain CTAS WITH NO
DATA, ExecCheckRTPerms() will not be called. b) for explain analyze
CTAS WITH NO DATA, ExecCheckRTPerms() will be called. So, we need a).
This is what exactly this patch does i.e. ExecCheckRTPerms() will not
be called for both cases.
Attaching V3 patch, please review it.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Skip-Insert-Perm-Check-Bulk-Insert-State-alloc-in.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2020-11-12 11:53:55 | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
Previous Message | Alexey Kondratov | 2020-11-12 10:47:34 | Re: Misuse of TimestampDifference() in the autoprewarm feature of pg_prewarm |