Re: skip replication slot snapshot/map file removal during end-of-recovery checkpoint

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: skip replication slot snapshot/map file removal during end-of-recovery checkpoint
Date: 2022-01-08 04:41:22
Message-ID: CALj2ACX9ObDqJAhHqEXDY+-GarwpdTKjNk6FnskX2OOqPwXSqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:04 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12/23/21, 3:17 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Currently the end-of-recovery checkpoint can be much slower, impacting
> > the server availability, if there are many replication slot files
> > XXXX.snap or map-XXXX to be enumerated and deleted. How about skipping
> > the .snap and map- file handling during the end-of-recovery
> > checkpoint? It makes the server available faster and the next regular
> > checkpoint can deal with these files. If required, we can have a GUC
> > (skip_replication_slot_file_handling or some other better name) to
> > control this default being the existing behavior.
>
> I suggested something similar as a possibility in the other thread
> where these tasks are being discussed [0]. I think it is worth
> considering, but IMO it is not a complete solution to the problem. If
> there are frequently many such files to delete and regular checkpoints
> are taking longer, the shutdown/end-of-recovery checkpoint could still
> take a while. I think it would be better to separate these tasks from
> checkpointing instead.
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/A285A823-0AF2-4376-838E-847FA4710F9A%40amazon.com

Thanks. I agree to solve it as part of the other thread and close this
thread here.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-01-08 04:47:26 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2022-01-08 00:52:00 Re: Disallow quorum uncommitted (with synchronous standbys) txns in logical replication subscribers