From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Subject: | Re: allow segment size to be set to < 1GiB |
Date: | 2022-11-08 05:36:45 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACX0ZKAH2aTxhc5e6j66Lndo5zcTsqde0inBYBix9S_bfQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 8:06 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-11-07 12:52:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> How about instead allowing the segment size to be set in pages?
>
> > In addition or instead of --with-segsize/-Dsegsize?
>
> In addition to. What I meant by "instead" was to replace
> your proposal of --with-segsize-mb.
>
> > Just offering the number of pages seems like a not great UI.
>
> Well, it's a developer/debug focused API. I think regular users
> would only care for the existing --with-segsize = so-many-GB API.
> But for testing, I think --with-segsize-pages = so-many-pages
> is actually a pretty good UI.
Perhaps --with-segsize-blocks is a better name here as we use block
instead of page for --with-blocksize and --with-wal-blocksize.
If this option is for dev/debug purposes only, do we want to put a
mechanism to disallow it in release builds or something like that,
just in case? Or at least, add a note in the documentation?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-11-08 05:49:38 | Re: [patch] Have psql's \d+ indicate foreign partitions |
Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2022-11-08 05:27:06 | RE: logical replication restrictions |