Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, John Morris <john(dot)morris(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN
Date: 2024-02-29 18:11:45
Message-ID: CALj2ACWwvaf9u2JKVrNv+nVT4ZnB+NDsYV3WVJjx0fwjziw=tw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:04 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is a new version of the patch that uses the new atomic read/write
> functions with full barriers that were added in commit bd5132d. Thoughts?

Thanks for getting the other patch in. The attached v6 patch LGTM.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-02-29 18:14:51 Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY
Previous Message Давыдов Виталий 2024-02-29 17:34:42 Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR