Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:09 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:43:37AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > +1. However, a comment above helps one to understand why some GUCs are
> > defined before if (!process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress). As
> > this is an example extension, it will help understand the reasoning
> > better. I know we will it in the commit message, but a direct comment
> > helps:
> >
> > /*
> > * Note that this GUC is defined irrespective of worker_spi shared library
> > * presence in shared_preload_libraries. It's possible to create the
> > * worker_spi extension and use functions without it being specified in
> > * shared_preload_libraries. If we return from here without defining this
> > * GUC, the dynamic workers launched by worker_spi_launch() will keep
> > * crashing and restarting.
> > */
>
> WFM to be more talkative here and document things, but I don't think
> that's it. How about a simple "These GUCs are defined even if this
> library is not loaded with shared_preload_libraries, for
> worker_spi_launch()."

LGTM.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com