| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag |
| Date: | 2023-10-05 16:23:33 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWdR1S6goq2WACeao+jERRNs7ntTBxZY+Rde+E6w=BQ-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:32 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> + CREATE ROLE nologrole with nologin;
> + GRANT CREATE ON DATABASE mydb TO nologrole;
A few nit-picks:
1. s/with/WITH
2. s/nologin/NOLOGIN
3. + is specified as <varname>flags</varname> it is possible to
bypass the login check to connect to databases.
How about "it is possible to bypass the login check for the role used
to connect to databases."?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-10-05 16:45:18 | pg16: invalid page/page verification failed |
| Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-10-05 16:02:43 | Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag |