| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add LSN along with offset to error messages reported for WAL file read/write/validate header failures |
| Date: | 2022-12-22 11:33:35 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWPYNGzzmi5=crRmy3gmeYfhCuvbHSv_4fdpKNLZJySTA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:19:24PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > In the first place "file sequence number" and "segno" can hardly be
> > associated by appearance by readers, I think. (Yeah, we can identify
> > that since the another parameter is identifiable alone.) Why don't we
> > spell out the parameter simply as "segment number"?
>
> As in using "sequence number" removing "file" from the docs and
> changing the OUT parameter name to segment_number rather than segno?
> Fine by me.
+1.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2022-12-22 11:59:34 | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-12-22 11:27:32 | Re: Add LSN along with offset to error messages reported for WAL file read/write/validate header failures |