From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |
Date: | 2024-03-25 20:20:42 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACWDDDpzVzrLoYK-xSQfN64Rs5TtEcGRmTp6qkeX74r6aA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:30 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:49:12PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> In the same vein, I think deactivated_at or inactive_since might be
> >> good names to consider. I think they get at the same thing as
> >> released_time, but they avoid introducing a completely new word
> >> (release, as opposed to active/inactive).
> >
> > Yeah, I'd vote for inactive_since then.
>
> Having only skimmed some of the related discussions, I'm inclined to agree
> that inactive_since provides the clearest description for the column.
I think we all have some agreement on inactive_since. So, I'm
attaching the patch for that change.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Use-a-less-confusing-name-for-slot-s-last_inactiv.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2024-03-25 21:22:08 | Re: pgsql: make dist uses git archive |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-25 20:00:26 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-03-25 20:31:50 | Re: Large block sizes support in Linux |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-03-25 20:19:00 | Re: Large block sizes support in Linux |