| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Crash after a call to pg_backup_start() |
| Date: | 2022-10-22 08:38:13 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWC+oE9+rjYpJ2y=pDDx+MQc4LAE9VqoM7SNo7zJoR+gQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 1:56 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > Why can't we just get rid of the Assert and treat during_backup_start
> > as backup_marked_active_in_shmem or something like that to keep things
> > simple?
>
> Why is that simpler?
IMO, the assertion looks complex there and thinking if we can remove it.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-10-22 08:58:10 | Re: Pluggable toaster |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-10-22 08:26:45 | Re: Crash after a call to pg_backup_start() |